top of page

The Age of Aisha at the Time of her Marriage to Prophet Muhammad

  • Writer: Aslam Abdullah
    Aslam Abdullah
  • Sep 12, 2020
  • 17 min read

Updated: Nov 8


ree

 Historical Marriage Practices Across Cultures: A Comprehensive Study

Executive Summary

This article examines marriage practices, particularly the age of marriage, across various ancient and medieval civilizations. The evidence demonstrates that early marriage was a widespread phenomenon across cultures, religions, and continents for millennia. This was not unique to any single civilization but instead reflected the social, economic, and demographic realities of pre-modern societies.

Ancient Rome (753 BCE – 476 CE)

Roman marriage law established precise minimum ages for lawful consent. According to Roman legal codes, the age of lawful consent to marriage was twelve years for girls and fourteen years for boys. In practice, most Roman women married in their early teens to young men in their twenties. Marriage in Roman society primarily served as a tool for creating inter-familial alliances and consolidating political power among elite families.

The legal framework of Roman marriage underwent significant evolution over time. During the early Republic, manumission marriage was the norm, in which a bride passed from the authority of her father to that of her husband. By the time of Julius Caesar, however, "free marriage" had become more common, wherein a wife remained under her father's legal authority even after marriage, though she lived with her husband. This arrangement granted Roman women considerable independence relative to women in many other ancient cultures.

Roman law also granted daughters inheritance rights nearly equal to those of sons, and women could own property, conduct business, and seek legal recourse in courts. These progressive elements coexisted with the practice of early marriage, demonstrating that age at marriage was not necessarily correlated with women's overall legal and social status.

Ancient Mesopotamia: Sumerian and Babylonian Civilizations (c. 5000 – 539 BCE)

The Sumerian civilization, which flourished between approximately 5000 and 2400 BCE in Mesopotamia, established family relationships through formal marriage contracts. These contracts included a proposal and required the bridegroom to pay a dowry to the bride's family. Interestingly, Sumerian law prohibited men from having multiple wives while the first wife was still living. However, a second marriage was permitted if the wife died or was unable to bear children.

When a girl became engaged, she was considered a member of her husband's family. If the husband died, his brother or another male relative was obligated to marry the widow. Sumerian families operated under a patriarchal structure, yet women enjoyed relatively high status. Both sons and daughters had equal shares in their father's property, and women possessed the right to own land, buy and sell property in their own name, keep slaves, adopt children, and seek refuge in the courts. However, by the end of the Sumerian civilization, women's status had gradually declined.

The subsequent Babylonian civilization, which rose around 2000 BCE in the same region, adopted a more patriarchal view of marriage. The father of the bride would give his daughter in marriage, and the groom would pay the father a bride prize, reinforcing the transactional nature of marriage alliances.

Ancient Persia (c. 550 BCE – 651 CE)

In the Persian civilization, which emerged around 550 BCE on the land that is now Iran, marriage was regarded as a sacred relationship with profound religious significance. The bride and groom exchanged vows in front of witnesses during elaborate wedding ceremonies. Persian marriage customs emphasized the spiritual and communal aspects of the union, reflecting Zoroastrian religious values that influenced Persian society.

The Byzantine Empire later raised the minimum marriage age for females to thirteen years old, specifically to reflect Persian customs, indicating that Persian practices were viewed as more progressive in this regard compared to some neighboring cultures.

Ancient Egypt (c. 3150 BCE – 30 BCE)

The Egyptian civilization, with marriage ceremonies dating back to approximately 3150 BCE, placed a strong emphasis on fertility and procreation within marriage. Wedding ceremonies were elaborate affairs in which the bride and groom would trade rings and bracelets during religious rituals. Marriage in ancient Egypt served both spiritual and practical purposes, ensuring the continuation of family lines and the proper transfer of property and status across generations.

Ancient Greece (c. 800 BCE – 146 BCE)

In ancient Greece, marriage was primarily regarded as a means of creating political alliances and maintaining social order. Greeks practiced arranged marriages, with families negotiating matches based on social status, wealth, and political considerations. Girls were typically married as early as twelve years old, though more commonly between fourteen and twenty. Men, by contrast, rarely married before completing their military service as ephebes, usually marrying in their twenties or later.

The Greeks believed strongly in arranged marriages, and the concept of marrying for romantic love was not the primary consideration. The bride and groom would exchange vows in front of witnesses, and the marriage was seen as a contract between families rather than merely between individuals.

Ancient China (c. 1600 BCE – 1912 CE)

Chinese marriage customs, which first emerged around 1600 BCE, viewed marriage as essential for continuing the family line and fulfilling filial duties. Before the Qin Dynasty in the third century BCE, a man's marriageable age typically ranged from twenty to thirty years, while a woman's marriageable age ranged from fifteen to twenty years. Most girls married between the ages of fifteen and twenty, with marriage at twenty being extremely common and not considered late by cultural standards.

The average marriage age was approximately fifteen to sixteen for women and twenty for men, though there was considerable variation, particularly among men. During the elaborate wedding ritual, the bride and groom would exchange tea instead of wedding bands, symbolizing the blending of two families. Marriage and family structure in China were profoundly shaped by Confucian philosophy, which emphasized filial piety, hierarchical family relationships, and the continuation of ancestral lines.


ree

Ancient India (c. 1500 BCE – 500 CE)

Marriage practices in ancient India underwent significant evolution over time. During the early Vedic period and in Tantric traditions, girls were married approximately eight years after menarche, meaning they would typically marry around the age of twenty to twenty-one. This relatively late marriage age suggests that early Vedic society placed a high value on maturity and readiness for marriage.

However, during the later Smriti period, the age of marriage for girls dropped dramatically to as young as eight years old. This lowering of the marriage age indicates a significant cultural shift from earlier Vedic practices. In the Maurya period (c. 322 – 185 BCE), the customary age of marriage was sixteen years for boys and twelve years for girls. The upper age limit for a girl's marriage was generally fifteen in later historical periods.

Some Hindu religious texts, such as the Ramayana and Skanda Purana, describe child marriages among divine figures. For example, Rama marrying Sita when she was six and he was thirteen, or Krishna marrying Rukmini when she was eight. However, scholars caution that these are mythological narratives rather than historical records and may not accurately reflect actual social practices of the time.

Jewish Tradition (Talmudic Period, c. 200 BCE – 500 CE)

Jewish marriage customs, as recorded in the Talmud and other rabbinic literature, reflect a complex approach to the appropriate age for marriage. Citing the divine command in Genesis 1:28 to "be fruitful and multiply," rabbinic authorities considered the period between puberty and age twenty to be the ideal time for both men and women to get married. Some rabbis advocated for eighteen as the most perfect age, while others recommended marriage as early as possible after puberty, around age fourteen.

The Talmud recommends that men marry at approximately eighteen years of age, or somewhere between sixteen and twenty-four. The minimum age for marriage under Jewish law was thirteen for boys and twelve for girls, though marriages could be arranged even before these ages. A ketannah (literally "little one"), defined as a girl between the ages of three and twelve years plus one day, could be given in marriage by her father without her consent. However, upon reaching maturity, she would have to agree to the marriage for it to be considered legally binding.

Babylonian rabbis understood marriage as God's means of channeling male sexuality appropriately and therefore advocated for early marriage to prevent men from succumbing to temptation. Rabbi Hisda maintained that early marriage could lead to increased intelligence and other benefits. However, rabbinic authorities also warned against significant age gaps between spouses, particularly condemning the practice of marrying a young daughter to an old man, which they compared to forcing her into prostitution.

Interestingly, historical evidence suggests that actual practice varied considerably from these prescriptive texts. In some Jewish communities, men did not marry until they were thirty years of age or older. In medieval Ashkenazi communities, women often married at a young age; however, since the Enlightenment period, young marriage has become increasingly rare among Jewish communities worldwide.

Medieval Europe (c. 500 – 1500 CE)

Canon Law heavily influenced medieval European marriage practices, the legal system of the Catholic Church. Following the legal scholar Gratian in the twelfth century, Canon Law set the minimum age for marriage at twelve years for girls and fourteen years for boys. This did not mean that priests never performed marriages for younger individuals, but these ages represented the official minimum for lawful consent.

However, the legal minimum should not be confused with the typical age at which people get married. In practice, marriage ages varied considerably depending on economic circumstances, social class, and regional customs. Medieval England, for example, saw marriage age as highly variable, with couples often delaying marriage until their early twenties, particularly during difficult economic times. Common marriage ages were fourteen to eighteen for girls and sixteen to twenty for boys among the general population.

Research on historical demographics reveals that, despite famous examples of child marriages among royalty, most people in medieval Europe married considerably older than popular imagination suggests. The average age for women at first marriage has been above twenty-four since 1550 in many parts of Western Europe, while men typically married in their mid-to-late twenties.

Royal Child Marriages: Political Alliances

Among European royalty and aristocracy, child marriages were more common and served explicitly political purposes. These marriages were arranged to secure peace treaties, forge alliances, and consolidate territorial claims. Two notable examples illustrate this practice:

Isabella of Valois (1389 – 1409): In 1396, Isabella of Valois was only six years old when she was married to Richard II, King of England, who was twenty-nine years old at the time, twenty-two years her senior. This marriage was arranged to secure peace between England and France during the Hundred Years' War. It was explicitly agreed that the marriage would not be consummated until Isabella was older. She became Queen of England and held that title until 1399, when Richard was deposed.

Mary, Queen of Scots (1542 – 1587): At the age of five, Mary was formally betrothed to the Dauphin François, the heir to the French throne. She was sent to France at this young age as part of the marriage agreement, where she would be raised at the French court and protected from English invasion. The actual marriage ceremony took place when Mary was fifteen years old. By age seventeen, she was already a widow following François's death.

These royal examples demonstrate that while child betrothals and marriages occurred among the aristocracy for political reasons, they were exceptional cases rather than the norm for the general population.

Byzantine Empire (c. 330 – 1453 CE)

The Byzantine Empire, the eastern continuation of the Roman Empire, maintained specific legal requirements for marriage. Byzantine civil law stated that betrothed individuals had to be at least seven years old, and the Church recognized betrothals of seven-year-old children as valid. However, Byzantine law decreed that actual marriage should not take place until the bride was over twelve years old and the groom was fourteen, ages considered appropriate for parenting.

In practice, the average age of marriage for Byzantines was fifteen to twenty-five years for boys and thirteen to sixteen years for girls. Parental approval, particularly from both parents, played a decisive role in marriage arrangements. Notably, the Byzantine Empire raised the minimum marriage age for females to thirteen specifically to reflect Persian customs, which were viewed as setting a higher standard in this regard.

African and Native American Civilizations

Marriage practices in African and Native American civilizations were diverse, reflecting the wide variety of cultures across these continents. In many African societies, marriage was seen as a way for tribes and communities to form alliances and strengthen social bonds. Polygamy was prevalent in various African tribes, with wealthy and powerful men often having multiple wives. Wedding ceremonies were typically officiated by shamans or other religious leaders and involved elaborate rituals specific to each culture.

In Native American civilizations, marriage was typically viewed as a sacred union between two individuals, often carrying spiritual significance. Marriage practices varied enormously among the hundreds of distinct Native American nations, from matrilineal societies where women held considerable power to more patriarchal structures.


ree

Pre-Islamic Arabia (c. 500 – 632 CE)

Interestingly, there is very little historical evidence for widespread child marriage in pre-Islamic Arabia. A variety of different marriage practices existed during this period, but documentation of specific marriage ages is scarce. Apart from the various hadith (Islamic traditions) attesting to Aisha's age at marriage to Prophet Muhammad, there are very few other documented cases of child marriages in pre-Islamic Arabian society.

This absence of evidence is significant, as it suggests that child marriage may not have been a common or normative practice in Arabian culture before Islam. Modern practices in some Arab countries, such as Saudi Arabia, which historically has had no legal minimum age for marriage, do not necessarily reflect ancient Arabian customs; instead, they may represent later cultural developments.

European Civilization and the Church (c. 1000 CE onward)

By around 1000 CE, European civilization had increasingly come to view marriage as a religious sacrament rather than merely a civil contract. The Catholic Church played a central role in regulating marriage, and wedding ceremonies became formalized religious rituals. The bride and groom would exchange rings during a ceremony officiated by a priest, and the marriage was understood to be a sacred covenant blessed by God and indissoluble except by death or Church annulment.

The Church's emphasis on marriage as a sacrament gradually elevated the status of marriage. It introduced concepts of mutual consent and the spiritual equality of spouses, even as patriarchal social structures continued to dominate.

Comparative Analysis and Conclusions

A comprehensive survey of historical marriage practices reveals several vital patterns:

Universal Practice: Early marriage, particularly for girls in their early to mid-teens, was a common practice across virtually all ancient and medieval civilizations, regardless of religion, geography, or cultural tradition. This was not unique to any single culture but rather reflected universal demographic and social realities of pre-modern societies.

Legal Minimums vs. Actual Practice: The legal minimum ages for marriage (typically twelve for girls and fourteen for boys) were often lower than the actual average age of marriage in many societies. Economic circumstances, social class, and individual family situations created considerable variation in actual marriage ages.

Political Marriages: Among royalty and aristocracy, marriages were frequently arranged at very young ages for political purposes—to secure alliances, prevent wars, or consolidate territorial claims. These marriages were often not consummated until the bride was of a more advanced age.

Gender Disparities: Across virtually all cultures, girls are married younger than boys, often by several years. This reflected patriarchal social structures and the economic value placed on women's reproductive capacity.

Evolution Over Time: Marriage ages have generally increased over time, particularly from the medieval period to the modern era. Enlightenment, industrialization, and changing economic structures have all contributed to later marriage ages in most societies.

Cultural Context Matters: Judging historical figures by modern standards constitutes historical anachronism. Marriage practices must be understood within their own artistic, economic, and demographic contexts. Life expectancy, financial structures, and social organization in pre-modern societies were fundamentally different from today.

The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that early marriage was a near-universal practice across human civilizations for thousands of years. To single out any particular historical figure or culture for practices that were normative across the ancient and medieval world is intellectually dishonest and represents a failure to understand history in its proper context.

 

The Age of Aisha: A Critical Examination of Historical Narratives

The age of Aisha bint Abu Bakr, the mother of the Believers, has long been a subject of controversy. Both critics and followers of Islam often rely on a narrow selection of reports from hadith collections, such as Sahih al-Bukhari, and various historical books to fuel this debate. These specific accounts claim Aisha was engaged to Prophet Muhammad at the age of six and the marriage was consummated when she was nine.

However, it is crucial to note that there is no reference to this event in the Quran, nor is there any direct statement from the Prophet (peace be upon him) confirming he married Aisha at such a young age. Despite this, a significant number of Muslim scholars have historically propagated these accounts as accurate and sound, with some even attributing the event to a divine plan. Consequently, few scholars have dared to question the authenticity of these reports, explore alternative narrations present in the same classical texts, or evaluate them against the clear criteria established by the Quran.

These alternative narratives directly challenge the notion that the mother of the Believers was a child at the time of her marriage. Yet, they are often ignored in favor of the more sensational accounts. This has led to an environment where foundational hadith books are elevated to a status rivaling the Quran, where every word is considered infallible and beyond question.

Ironically, the compiler of Sahih al-Bukhari, Imam Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari, was a master of critical evaluation. He famously purged over 98% of the hadith he collected, applying a meticulous methodology he developed. This methodology was the product of his human genius and piety; it was not divine revelation, which is reserved for prophets alone. Yet, when modern researchers apply the same spirit of critical inquiry to these accounts, especially by using the Quran as the ultimate criterion, they are often dismissed as "hadith deniers."

Defenders of the child-marriage narrative rarely ask the most vital questions:

•Is this what the Quran asks believers to practice?

•Was Prophet Muhammad sent to set an example of marrying a six or nine-year-old child?

•Does this account align with the Quran's teachings on marriage and maturity?

•Is this portrayal consistent with the known character of the Prophet?

Instead, energy and resources are spent defending these accounts, even if it means inadvertently tarnishing the image of the Prophet and the wisdom of God. This is not a conscious choice but a consequence of neglecting the Quranic method for verifying facts. The Quran continually reminds believers: "And do not pursue that of which you do not know. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart—about all those [one] will be questioned." (Quran 17:36)

This creates a paradox. When non-Muslims accuse the Prophet of marrying a child, some scholars defensively call it a conspiracy to malign Islam. Yet, when Muslims counter these accusations by presenting alternative historical evidence, their efforts are denounced as heretical. In non-Muslim circles, the argument is made that the facts are misunderstood and that Islam does not promote child marriage. But within Muslim circles, the very same accounts are used to justify child marriage, claiming it as a prophetic tradition (Sunnah). It is a profound contradiction that none of these advocates would consent to give their own six or nine-year-old daughter in marriage to a grown man.

This dogmatic adherence has so contaminated the minds of many followers that any discussion of alternative narratives becomes unacceptable. Those who question the dominant version of history are often declared apostates, heretics, or deviants who must renew their faith. In this view, only a select few are entitled to define and interpret historical facts, and anyone who deviates is labeled a troublemaker.

However, a critical examination of alternative narratives, found within the very same books of hadith and history, presents a more coherent and logical picture.

Historical Context and Counter-Narratives

Before accepting any single position, consider these facts drawn from classical Islamic sources:

1. The Reliability of the Primary Narrator

The report of Aisha's age primarily comes from a single narrator, Hisham ibn Urwah, who cited his father. If such an event had occurred, it would have been widely known and reported by many others in Medina. Notably, Imam Malik ibn Anas, a contemporary of Hisham and a leading scholar in Medina, did not include this narration in his foundational hadith text, the Muwatta.

Furthermore, Hisham ibn Urwah's reliability came into question late in his life. For 71 years, while living in Medina, he never mentioned this report. He only began narrating it after moving to Iraq at an advanced age. Scholars of the time noted this discrepancy. Yaqub ibn Shaibah states in Tehzib al-Tehzib: "He [Hisham] is highly reliable, his narratives are acceptable, except what he narrated after moving over to Iraq." It is also reported: "I heard that Malik ibn Anas objected to those narratives of Hisham which were reported through the people of Iraq." Al-Zahabi, in Mizan al-I'tidal, adds: "When he was old, Hisham's memory suffered quite badly."

2. Aisha's Birth in the Pre-Islamic Era

The historian Al-Tabari states: "All four of his [Abu Bakr's] children were born of his two wives... during the pre-Islamic period." The pre-Islamic period, or Jahiliyyah, ended with the first revelation to the Prophet in 610 CE. If Aisha was born before this, she would have been at least 13-14 years old at the time of her marriage in 623/624 CE, not six or nine.

3. Aisha's First Engagement

Tabari also reports that before the Prophet's proposal, Abu Bakr had already engaged Aisha to the son of Mut'am ibn 'Adi. When Abu Bakr planned to migrate to Abyssinia (8 years before the Hijrah, or around 614 CE), he asked Mut'am to take Aisha into his home as his son's wife. Mut'am refused and broke the engagement because Abu Bakr had converted to Islam. For Aisha to have been engaged at this time, she would have had to be of marriageable age, not a toddler. If the marriage to the Prophet took place around 10 years later, this timeline places her well into her late teens.

4. The Age of Her Sister, Asma

Multiple sources confirm that Aisha's older sister, Asma, was ten years her senior. The historian Ibn Kathir reports that Asma died in the year 73 AH at the age of 100. A simple calculation shows that if Asma was 100 years old in 73 AH, she must have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of the Hijrah (migration to Medina) in 1 AH. If Asma was ten years older than Aisha, then Aisha's age at the Hijrah would have been 17 or 18. Since the marriage was consummated in the first or second year after the Hijrah, Aisha would have been between 18 and 20 years old.

5. Participation in Battles

The rules of engagement in the Prophet's army were clear: youths under the age of 15 were not permitted to participate in battles. Sahih al-Bukhari records that Ibn 'Umar was turned away from the Battle of Uhud at age 14 but was permitted to join the Battle of the Trench a year later at 15. However, hadith in both Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim confirm Aisha's presence at the Battles of Badr (2 AH) and Uhud (3 AH), where she was actively providing water and support to the soldiers. Her participation indicates she must have been at least 15 years old at the time of Uhud, making her at least 14 at the time of her marriage consummation—not nine.

6. Her Memory of Quranic Revelation

In Sahih al-Bukhari, Aisha herself states: "I was a young girl (jariyah) when Surah Al-Qamar was revealed." Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Quran, was revealed around eight years before the Hijrah (c. 614 CE). The Arabic word jariyah refers to an adolescent girl, not a toddler. If she was a "young girl" at this time, she would have been between 17 and 21 years old at the time of her marriage, which aligns perfectly with the other historical data points.

7. The Quran's Stance on Marriage

The Quran itself provides the ultimate refutation of child marriage. It explicitly links marriage to maturity and sound judgment: "And test the orphans [in their abilities] until they reach the age of marriage. Then if you perceive in them sound judgment, release their property to them..." (Quran 4:6). This verse establishes the "age of marriage" as an age of intellectual and financial maturity, not childhood. It is unthinkable that the Prophet Muhammad or his closest companion, Abu Bakr, would so flagrantly violate a divine commandment they were entrusted to uphold.

A Befitting Reply to the Accusation

The accusation that Prophet Muhammad was a pedophile is a baseless smear, born from a combination of historical misinterpretation and cultural prejudice. It relies exclusively on a handful of anomalous reports while ignoring the overwhelming body of evidence to the contrary found in the very same classical sources.

Furthermore, accusers apply modern, Western standards of marriageable age to a 7th-century Arabian context, a clear act of historical anachronism. To judge historical figures, we must do so by the standards of their own time and culture, not ours. Historical records show that marriage at a young age was a near-universal practice across civilizations and faiths for millennia. For instance:

•In Jewish Tradition: The Talmud, a central text of Rabbinic Judaism, discusses the legalities of marriage for minors.

•In Christian Europe: Throughout the medieval and early modern periods, aristocratic and royal families frequently arranged marriages for their children at very young ages for political alliances. Mary, Queen of Scots, was formally betrothed at age five. Isabella of Valois was married to King Richard II of England at the age of six.

•In Ancient Rome: The legal age for girls to marry was 12, a standard that influenced much of Western civilization for centuries.

To single out Prophet Muhammad for marrying a young adult that was not the global norm is intellectually dishonest. It is not an objective critique but a targeted attack.

References

1."Marriage in ancient Rome." Wikipedia.

2.Khatun, M. (2023). "Ancient Civilizations and Marriage: A Comparative Study." International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 27-53.  

3."Jewish views on marriage." Wikipedia.

4."Isabella of Valois." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella_of_Valois

5."Early Byzantine Period: Marriage Customs." Institute for Mediterranean Studies.

6."Western European marriage pattern." Wikipedia.

7."Marriageable age." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriageable_age

8."General standards of ancient Chinese marriage: Age." Keats Chinese.

9. Various academic sources on marriage practices in ancient civilizations were accessed through historical databases and scholarly articles.

Join the Email List

Thanks for subscribing!

© Aslam Abdullah

bottom of page